I expect most readers will be familiar with the debate in anthropology over its contemporary militarization: the incorporation and appropriation of anthropologists and anthropological knowledge in the service of military power, most notably through ‘Human Terrain Teams’.
But it’s a much wider debate that isn’t limited by the military’s ‘cultural turn’ and what I once called ‘the rush to the intimate’ (see DOWNLOADS tab), and recent ‘Human Geography Summits‘ have repeatedly drawn attention to the strategic and tactical significance of geo-spatial intelligence and geographical modelling in apprehending (and appropriating) that ‘human terrain’ (for the 2013 meeting see here).
And now, over at Antipode, there is a must-read open-access column by Joel Wainwright: ‘“A remarkable disconnect”: On violence, military research, and the AAG’ . As you’ll see, it’s about much more than the wretched Bowman Expeditions to Central America, important as they are and indispensable as Joel’s critique in Geopiracy has been (see also my brief commentary on different ‘expeditions’ here).
The first part of Joel’s argument, ‘Misunderstanding militarized’, is available at the Public Political Ecology Lab here.